New Yorkers will learn the identity of their next mayor this Tuesday, in a contest that will decide who governs and protects the country's most populous metropolis at a time when Donald Trump has vowed to deploy military troops to the urban center.
Against that backdrop, New York has experienced a mayoral election that has pitted two very different Democratic figures against each other. The election has turned into an acrimonious face-off, laced with accusations of racial bias and anti-Muslim sentiment, but it is the ideological divide between the two leading contenders that could have significant consequences for how the Democratic party performs in next year's midterm elections.
On the left side is Zohran Mamdani, the young progressive candidate whose rapid ascent and grassroots campaign has brought international attention. Representing the old guard is Andrew Cuomo, the ex- New York governor now running as an independent – and enjoying the support of wealthy contributors and big business.
As the election approaches, it is the progressive, the former longshot who beat his opponent in the party primary who is solidly positioned as the leading candidate. Mamdani, who has run on a agenda of economic justice and promised to freeze rent for about two million New Yorkers, has led his rival by significant margins in every poll conducted in the fall, and it is very much the younger man's election to throw away.
However, the former governor, who stepped down as governor in 2021 amid allegations of sexual harassment, has made it clear he will battle to the end, and not necessarily in an above-the-belt manner. He has trashed his opponent's goals as unachievable, and in recent days chuckled along as a radio host made anti-Muslim comments about Mamdani, who is Muslim. Two weeks ago, the independent was widely condemned as racist after posting an AI-generated ad that included a slew of racial caricatures and showed Mamdani freeing a group of criminals.
It's been a rather grubby end to an race that could be critical to the direction that the party, struggling in its reaction to the former president's power moves, adopts in the coming years.
Should the progressive secures a clear victory, the party establishment who have refused to endorse his campaign will be compelled to address a message that has appealed to Americans' anger at inequality, inflation and the establishment. It would be difficult for Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries not to adopt at least a portion of Mamdani's ambitious ideas about affordability, given the newcomer has generated an excitement within the party arguably not seen since Bernie Sanders campaigned for the White House in 2016.
Conversely, should Cuomo, who had been expected to win easily in the June primary, complete a remarkable riches-to-rags-to-riches win, it could reinforce the party's existing approach of considered, uninspiring resistance – a strategy that has angered grassroots members. A NYC rejection of the progressive's optimistic platform could convince party leaders that the wisest course is to stick to the center – even as polls show the present version of the Democratic party is widely disliked across the country.
Residents of the city appear to favor the progressive agenda. Polls show that Mamdani supporters are far more enthusiastic about their choice than Cuomo backers, something that has been apparent throughout the campaign. The candidate's engaging content on social media, his optimistic vision for New York and his willingness to actually venture out and meet people in the city has drawn an force of more than 50,000 volunteers, many of them youth or new participants.
Yet, Cuomo, in his late sixties, isn't giving up. And with the stakes stacked against him, the ex-leader has turned to negative campaigning in the final days.
After spending months launching various attacks at his opponent to see what might stick, Cuomo has narrowed his focus on attacking the candidate personally. He has called Mamdani, who was of Ugandan origin to Indian parents, an “extremist”, and appeared on conservative media for an interview with a rightwing host, where the candidate asserted the city “will not survive” Mamdani as mayor. It reached a nadir last week, when the former governor laughed along and said “that’s another problem” after a broadcaster said the candidate would “cheer” another terrorist attack.
This strategy mirrors much of what Trump, who has sent the national guard to Washington DC and warned to do the same to NYC, has said about Mamdani, and perhaps that shouldn’t come as a surprise. A group of billionaire New Yorkers, including some who donated to Trump in the last presidential race, have invested heavily into trying to elect Cuomo into office, as other influential figures have urged the Republican candidate to drop out from the race.
As far as the Cuomo camp, and his billionaire supporters, are worried, it should never have come to this point. When the assemblyman, one of 150 state legislators, started his campaign for mayor in last year, not many had heard of him, and in truth, barely anyone even noticed.
The former governor, by comparison, entered smoothly into the contest in March 2025 and became the instant favorite. He was the political heavyweight who seemingly held every edge. The quintessential political insider, he had married a Kennedy and worked in a Democratic presidency. He became the state's leader in 2011, seventeen years after his father, Mario Cuomo, stepped down from the identical role.
The progressive, who was elected to the New York state assembly in recently, does not have the same political heritage. But his commitment to providing free buses and free childcare – along with the rent control promise – offer a more positive vision of the city's direction than his opponent's pessimistic predictions about “mayhem” and unfettered crime, and his vow to hire more police officers.
Nevertheless, Mamdani has faced some challenges in the final phase, after video surfaced appearing to show him implying the New York police department and the IDF were intertwined.
“We have to make clear that when the pressure of the NYPD is on your throat, it’s been laced by the Israeli military,” the candidate said in the recording, filmed at a DSA gathering in 2023. The progressive, a vocal opponent of Israel who has said the country is committing genocide in the Palestinian territory, indicated he was criticizing cooperative programs between the NYPD and Israeli forces.
With the election nearing, the candidate appears to have won empathy and backing, however, for his response to his opponent's increasing rhetoric.
The progressive addressed the independent's 9/11 remarks in an emotional video. In it, the candidate recalled how, when he first campaigned for the legislature, a family member suggested to him that he did not have to disclose about his religion. It was a realization, he said, that many Muslim New Yorkers had been taught “again and again”: “That security could only be found in the margins of our community. That it is in those shadows alone where followers of Islam could embrace their true selves, and that if we were to step out from those seclusion, then it is in those shadows that we must leave our faith.”
Addressing the actions of his opponents, who has alleged Mamd
Lena Visser is techjournalist met focus op startups en digitale transformatie in Eindhoven.