The recent American bombardment in Venezuela and the detention of its leader have sparked worry regarding Washington's ambitions on the Arctic territory. Supporters of the ex-president's base have allegedly turned their attention to the strategically important island following the events in South America.
Only a short time following the initiation of the Venezuelan campaign, a well-known conservative commentator, who is married to a senior presidential aide, shared a suggestive map. The graphic depicted Greenland draped with the stars and stripes, with the cryptic message: "COMING."
This overt threat to claim the mineral-rich land, which is a member of the North Atlantic alliance, provoked immediate and strong condemnation from Denmark's officials.
"We are strong partners and should keep work together as such. American security is equally Greenland’s and Denmark’s security," declared the Danish ambassador to the United States. "The Kingdom of Denmark and the United States work together to guarantee security in the Arctic."
The diplomat additionally pointed out that Denmark had substantially boosted its defence spending this year, allocating a substantial sum expressly for Northern and regional security. "Furthermore, we expect full recognition for the sovereign borders of the our realm," he emphasized.
The tensions were additionally exacerbated by the previous appointment of a Southern governor as a representative to Greenland. The governor had openly expressed gratitude to the commander-in-chief, saying it was an "honour" to work in a unpaid capacity to "make Greenland a part of the US."
After the events in Venezuela, this representative praised the president's actions, connecting it to the broader "war on drugs."
Ever since assuming office, the US president has consistently unnerved transatlantic allies with his stated desire in Greenland. The island is considered vitally strategic for national security and potential resource extraction. It already houses the northernmost US air base.
In a significant media appearance, the president declined to exclude the resorting to armed action to gain control of Greenland. This stance comes amid growing great-power competition in the polar region. "I don't rule it out. I don't say I'm going to do it, but I don't rule out anything... We need Greenland very badly," he remarked.
He described Greenland as having a "tiny amount of people, which we’ll look after, and we’ll cherish them... But we need that for international security."
In response to this persistent "rhetoric" of intent, Danish security agency took the extraordinary step last month of classifying the United States as a "security risk."
The leaders of both Greenland issued a unified and forceful statement: "We have said it very clearly before. Now we say it again... You must not annex other countries."
Public opinion in Greenland shows a nuanced picture. While a vast majority of the island's inhabitants desire independence from Denmark, there is also little to no desire to become part of the United States. The island has had the legal right to declare independence for many years.
Military experts are now reconsidering the possibility of such a action. One policy director focusing in military analysis admitted she had previously dismissed the rhetoric but was "currently not so sure."
"It wouldn't be that hard for the US to deploy a few hundred or a few thousand troops inside of Greenland, and it's not clear to me who could do anything about it," she observed.
Lena Visser is techjournalist met focus op startups en digitale transformatie in Eindhoven.